Fast proposal system
T-023 -> T-034 -> T-035Start after the overdue backlog and one real proposal expose the actual bottleneck.
The voice agent explains any task, answers questions grounded in this plan, and records a brain dump. Voice feedback is read-only and cannot approve or execute work. Allow the microphone when your browser asks.
The explicit Sonnet rollback keeps the existing capsule-only protocol. A lost connection retries the same Sonnet engine twice and reloads the complete persisted conversation. It never changes models during a conversation.
Grok by xAI · Think Fast 2.0 · Orion · no fallbackVoice answers are review evidence. Approval, sending, spending, and production changes stay in the originating chat. Voice trouble in this page? Open the standalone voice page.
A recovered priority map from every user message in the mixed-up Codex task, the complete 60-minute call, and the existing August 14 inventory. Every task is still pending and remains REVIEW.
Choose by who is waiting, direct money or trust loss, health capacity, and the cost of another delay. Stay on one task until its reviewable outcome is terminal or a dated blocked note names the missing dependency and next check.
Time-bound, not a false universal rank. The call says lead generation first tomorrow. The organized source says overdue paid-client work first. Both remain visible.
These shape work. They do not become three more active projects.
Preserved without allowing system building to displace the active cards.
T-023 -> T-034 -> T-035Start after the overdue backlog and one real proposal expose the actual bottleneck.
T-024 -> T-025 -> T-027 -> T-033Start after verified conversion definitions and one pilot client.
T-026 -> T-028 -> T-030 -> T-031Start after one reviewed manual example for one client and market.
T-024 -> T-032Start after one platform, decision, metric, and traffic constraint are named.
T-024 -> T-025 -> T-027 -> T-036Start after measurement and access policies are reliable.
C-004 + T-010 + T-012Start after the daily loop proves what information is actually missing.
Only extracted tasks and direct gates appear here. Arrows do not grant authority.
flowchart TD
R["T-002: cost-of-delay rule"] --> P["T-009: evening plan and close"]
R --> L["T-003: tomorrow lead block"]
R --> H["T-022: verified client backlog"]
S["T-006: sleep and recovery"] --> L
S --> H
P --> L
P --> C["T-020: active Codex cap"]
V["C-003: narrow voice continuity repair"] -. "only if voice blocks the close" .-> P
L --> G["C-002: validate lead qualification and Gergő handoff"]
H --> Q["T-023: test proposal workflow on one real case"]
M["T-024: verify PPC measurement"] --> D["T-025: portal V1"]
The extraction does not force false certainty where Matt's own statements changed.
Search or filter by priority lane. Every card includes why, when, and the dependency or decision gate.
01a00642-6dee-78f2-88af-e10a2c2fa4fa, the complete one-hour call from 20:18:15 to 21:18:15, the organized August 14 reconstruction, and the existing 36-task plan. The call extraction covered 340 turns and produced 44 merged Matt-originated evidence items. Seven independent supplemental tasks were added. Assistant suggestions were not converted into decisions. No task status, external system, client message, deployment, schedule, or approval was changed.