# Parent comparison: image 010

Parent: /root, local task 01a0e067-c27c-77f2-a3f9-ec52a44b62cf. Fresh describer: /root/blind_010, gpt-6-luna high, forked with no conversation context. Its only evidence input was this image. Parent read the completed description and verified the image checksum.

[Actual screenshot](../inputs/010.png) · [Independent description](../descriptions/010.md)

Variant A. Captured action: Existing unlinked contact now has one proposal. URL: https://calendar-stage-20260923.cfd-staging.com/panel/proposals/?proposal=p_d8602a6275cd9c1abd011d1c5e5b2f3a949ca7f3c206dc713b83e4dc3699990b. Screenshot SHA256: `c84b854491c2cc627bde57b7a9d0e14ab17efee6ab1d2ea4800cdd72eebf43a8`.

- C06: When Péter chooses an existing CRM contact with a proposal, then its proposal link reopens that record instead of creating a duplicate. When it has no proposal, Create makes and opens its first proposal.

**Parent comparison:** The description identifies the originally unlinked synthetic contact's first saved editor and populated customer sidebar. It observes empty included totals and a two-page PDF, which is expected for an unused template. The completed branch journey records Create followed by reopening the same proposal ID and unchanged counts. This picture is supporting visible state, not duplicate-count evidence.

[Completed GUI journeys and exact behavioral evidence](../../deployed-gui/scenario-matrix.md). Full criterion acceptance also requires the other applicable states and nonvisual checks. A screenshot alone does not prove persistence, timing, arithmetic or downloaded bytes.