KERTÚJÍTÓK / PROTOTYPE PLANNING / 09 SEPTEMBER 2026

A familiar sheet.
A better customer proposal.

Review Péter’s current workflow, understand the actual workbook, and decide on the smallest useful changes before creating the Google Sheet template.

FIXED PHASE-ONE REQUIREMENT · MATT’S INSTRUCTIONPéter fills in a Google Sheet.The generated proposal is the output. We are reviewing the structure and appearance here, not replacing the Sheet with a new input application.
WHAT THIS REVIEW CONTAINS

Understand first. Restructure lightly.

The source is “Árajánlat Küküllő utca 13.xlsx”, sent during the 14 August meeting. This static reproduction preserves its values, blank totals, unknown prices and merged-cell layout. Row heights are condensed for review. Blue notes explain current behavior. Orange notes are proposals for discussion.

1 sheetQuote + staged settlement
16 itemsMain work descriptions
18 formulasExisting arithmetic verified
374,500 FtCurrently populated quote total

Historical sample, not a new offer. Comments and copy suggestions can be added using the review toolbar. No spreadsheet calculations or proposal generation run on this page.

01 / CURRENT STATE

How Péter works today

  1. 01. Builds a project-specific work list

    Writes descriptions freely and can bundle work rather than itemize every operation. Pricing reflects the particular site.

    14 Aug · 204–230
  2. 02. Sends a useful starting point before everything is known

    Customers may still be choosing plants, quantities or the layout. A partially completed quote helps them make those decisions.

    14 Aug · 240–247
  3. 03. Shows unit prices as guidance

    For planting he enters a quantity of 1 to communicate a per-plant price, without knowing the final count or selection.

    14 Aug · 240–243
  4. 04. Enters and adjusts prices himself

    He calculates case by case. Access, terrain, carrying distance, equipment and commercial choices affect the price. He does not want AI choosing project prices.

    14 Aug · 159, 219–230
  5. 05. Separates labor, materials and transport

    Uses these three cost groups and totals them. The quote can contain a bundled work price rather than a detailed bill of materials.

    14 Aug · 204–208
  6. 06. Can use a day-rate arrangement

    Describes 180,000 Ft for eight hours plus travel, with an hourly adjustment if duration differs. That hourly rate is not specified, and this workbook does not implement the calculation.

    14 Aug · 205–207
  7. 07. Keeps adding and changing work

    New requests and better measurements can change the scope during the job. Extra work is recorded in its own section.

    14 Aug · 249–252 / workbook A25:H32
  8. 08. Settles progressively

    Adds the work and materials for each stage, records what the customer pays, and carries the unpaid balance forward.

    14 Aug · 208, 253–259
  9. 09. Reuses one workbook for quote and settlement

    Says he collapses the settlement section for sending. The supplied workbook contains both views and currently has no hidden columns.

    31 July · 128–130 / workbook
  10. 10. Wants the customer document to look better

    Says the spreadsheet works, but lacks elegance. He responds positively to a presentation layer over the existing data.

    14 Aug · 235–239

What we should preserve

  • His control over prices and commercial decisions.
  • Free-text work descriptions and bundled tasks.
  • The ability to quote before every detail is known.
  • Unit-price guidance without a false final amount.
  • Adding rows, extras and changing quantities.
  • Separate labor, materials and transport.
  • Staged settlement and actual payment tracking.
  • Control over what the customer receives.
  • The supplier-prepayment exception in the terms.
  • A spreadsheet as the phase-one input interface.
02 / SOURCE WORKBOOK

The existing sheet, with explanations

Read the original grid below. Click a numbered circle in the grid to read its note. Click the circle beside a note to return to its workbook cell. The settlement area continues to the right, through column P. Scroll horizontally to inspect it.

Blue = current use / source evidenceOrange = suggested restructuring
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
1Original embedded Kertújítók identity and payment terms01Elszámolás08
2Árajánlat1.2.3.
3MunkanemMenyiségi
egység
MennyiségMunkadíjSzállítási díjAnyagköltségMunkadíjAnyagköltségMunkadíjAnyagköltségMunkadíjAnyagköltség
4EgységárÖsszesenÖsszesenEgységárÖsszesen
5ö180 000 Ft09
6Komposzt és tőzeg behordás, terítés02m3312 000 Ft0336 000 Ft25 000 Ft14 500 Ft43 500 Ft
7Rotálásdb135 000 Ft35 000 Ft
8Vízforrás kialakításadb1?04
9Öntözőrendszer telepítés, 1 zóna, csepegtetődb1120 000 Ft120 000 Ft115 000 Ft115 000 Ft
10Kerti kút kialakításadb1?
11Kézi földmunkam21650 Ft
12esővíz elvezetés, szikkasztásdb1?
13tipegő lerakásdb1?
14Kerti kiülő kialakításam21?
15Kerti világítás kialakításadb1?
16Mulcs/apríték behordás, terítésm3112 000 Ft
17növényültetés 1l konténerdb1450 Ft05
18növényültetés 2-3l konténerdb1620 Ft
19növényültetés 5-7l konténerdb1940 Ft
20növényültetés 10-15l konténerdb11 350 Ft
21növényültetés 20-30l konténerdb12 600 Ft
22
23
24
25Pótmunka06
26Minden olyan munka, ami az eredeti árajánlatban nem szerepel, menet közben változott, új ígényként merült fel, előre nem lehetett pontosan felmérni, vagy a munkavégzés mennyisége, ideje, módja, jelentős mértékben módosult.
27MunkanemMunkadíjSzállítási díjAnyagköltség
28Menyiségi
egység
MennyiségEgységárÖsszesenÖsszesenEgységárÖsszesen
29
30
31
32
33191 000 Ft25 000 Ft158 500 FtÖsszesen:0 Ft0 Ft0 Ft0 Ft0 Ft0 Ft
340 Ft
35374 500 Ft07Kifizetve:0 Ft0 Ft0 Ft
360 Ft
37Tartozás:0 Ft

Original content and spelling retained. Formula cells display saved values. The embedded terms image is reproduced from the workbook. Formatting and row heights are adapted to make the HTML readable.

01
A1:H1 · embedded image

Terms and identity travel with the quote

CURRENT USE

The logo, contact details, work-start conditions and payment terms are one embedded image. Payment generally follows completed and accepted work, with a supplier-prepayment exception for plants, turf and similar materials.

Workbook image
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Separate project information from reusable terms

Keep the wording and exception. In Google Sheets, put project/address, revision date and reusable terms into a small Project tab. Keep the customer document styling outside the input table.

02
A6:C21

A flexible list, often incomplete

CURRENT USE

Péter writes project-specific work descriptions and quantities. Items and quantities can change during the job. A quantity of 1 sometimes means a unit-price example, especially planting, rather than one confirmed plant.

14 Aug · transcript lines 240–252
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Add a small status field

Use Included / Unit-price reference / Optional / To clarify. Keep adding rows freely. Do not infer inclusion from quantity = 1 or from a nonempty price.

03
D6:H21

Péter controls the prices

CURRENT USE

Labor, transport and materials are separate. He can bundle several tasks into one price. Site access, carrying distances and commercial judgment affect his pricing. Transport is a separate total, not quantity × rate.

14 Aug · lines 204–230 and workbook
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Keep manual prices and protect calculated totals

Retain editable descriptions, quantities and rates. Protect formula columns from accidental overwrites. Let status decide which rows count, while still allowing unknown values.

04
D8, D10, D12:D15

Six prices are unresolved

CURRENT USE

The source uses ? for work whose labor price is not yet known. That is different from zero, free work, or work already included in the total.

Workbook cells and 14 Aug · lines 240–252
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Give unknown a readable meaning

Keep numeric price cells empty and mark the price as To clarify. Output “Egyeztetés alatt”. The quote should still be usable when some items remain unknown.

05
D11, D16:D21 · E totals blank

Seven priced rows are outside the total

CURRENT USE

The seven rows have numeric labor unit prices but no E-column totals. Planting rows are unit-price guidance in the call. The intention for earthworks and mulch is not confirmed. Multiplying all seven would add 18,610 Ft incorrectly.

Workbook + 14 Aug · lines 240–243
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Make the distinction explicit

Label planting as unit-price reference. Confirm earthworks and mulch with Péter before assigning their status. Only intentionally included rows should affect the total.

06
A25:H32

Extra work is expected

CURRENT USE

This section covers new requests, changed scope and work that could not be measured accurately beforehand. It is blank in this example, but belongs to his existing process.

A26 source definition + 14 Aug · lines 208, 249–252
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Keep extras, with a short change note

Use the same row structure as the main work list, plus a Base / Extra field and optional change date/note. Show extras separately in the output. A revision label can explain which version was sent.

07
D33:H35

The quoted amount is 374,500 Ft

CURRENT USE

The existing formula totals are labor 191,000 Ft, transport 25,000 Ft and materials 158,500 Ft. This covers the populated included totals. It is not a complete price for every listed task.

Workbook · 18 formulas independently checked
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Keep the three subtotals

Label the output as the total of currently priced, included work. Separate unresolved and reference rows below it. Do not add a VAT claim, expiry date or payment deadline that has not been agreed.

08
K1:P37

Settlement happens in stages

CURRENT USE

Péter records labor and material amounts at successive stages, then actual payments. The balance is settled/accrued amount minus paid amount. In July he says he collapses settlement when sending the initial quote. This file has no hidden columns.

31 July · lines 128–130 / 14 Aug · 208, 253
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Use an Elszámolás tab in the same Google Sheet

Keep stages and payment entries. Make settlement a separate output when needed, not an automatic part of the initial proposal. Confirm where transport is allocated. Extra stages should be possible.

09
M5 · 180,000 Ft

An unexplained value outside the sums

CURRENT USE

M5 contains 180,000 Ft, but every settlement sum starts at row 6. It does not affect the quote, amount paid or balance. The call mentions the same day rate, but that does not establish this cell’s meaning.

Workbook M5 + 14 Aug · lines 205–207
SUGGESTED CHANGE

Clarify before mapping it

Do not import this value as a payment or price automatically. If day-rate work is needed, record its agreed meaning separately, including travel inclusion and the still-unknown hourly adjustment.

03 / PROPOSED GOOGLE SHEET STRUCTURE

Three tabs. One familiar workflow.

This is a review proposal, not a created template. Move structure around only where it removes ambiguity for the generated document.

Suggested tabContentsWhat stays familiar
ProjektProject/address, revision, customer details when known, reusable terms.A small header area. No duplicate data entry in a separate app.
AjánlatExisting work columns + explicit item status, Base/Extra, short note.Manual descriptions, quantities and prices. Protected totals. Unlimited additional rows.
ElszámolásStage/date, work and material amounts, payments and remaining balance.Progressive settlement. Initial quote output does not expose internal payment data.
The first change should be clarity, not more typing.Start with explicit item status and safe formulas. Add extra fields only if they make the customer document or settlement more reliable.
04 / DECISIONS FOR YOUR REVIEW

Questions worth settling before the template

  1. Are earthworks and mulch reference prices, optional work, or accidentally missing totals?
  2. What does the 180,000 Ft in M5 mean?
  3. Where does transport go in staged settlement?
  4. Which unit prices and internal details should the customer see?
  5. Should the output include a separate settlement document when needed?
  6. Which customer fields, VAT wording, validity and payment details are actually required?

Unknowns remain labelled. None of these decisions has been silently resolved in the source reproduction.

05 / OUTPUT DESIGN DIRECTIONS

Same source data. Three presentation options.

Each design is a static proposal-output sample. Review the hierarchy, clarity and visual style. Google Sheets remains the input in every option.

Evidence and limits

Current-use notes cite the full spoken transcript of 14 August 2026 and the prior 31 July discussion, plus the original workbook. Line references identify positions in the recovered transcript, not recording timestamps. Exact recording timestamps were unavailable. The attached workbook was matched byte for byte to the email attachment. The unexplained M5 value, net/gross status and some row-inclusion choices remain unconfirmed.

Prepared for Matt’s review. Full transcripts and private email evidence stay in the local research folder, outside the published asset directory.