Criterion revisions at authorized launch
Source: Matt’s four browser comments and explicit 2 October launch instruction. All prior 23 criteria are retained. New frontend quality checks make the scope precise. No check is marked passed.
participant-days: added nine specific checks
Reason: Matt Comment 1 asks for precise outputs, source completeness, meaningful UX and measurable success independent of superficial counts.
Acceptance impact: Hardens acceptance. No quantity or original source requirement removed.
rita-review / checkout: frontend clarification and eight added checks
Reason: Matt Comments 2 and 3 explicitly exclude backend work while requiring coherent content and UX.
Acceptance impact: Frontend local/fixture interactions prove user-visible transitions. No real integration required or falsely claimed.
journey-canvas: two added checks
Reason: Matt Comment 4 requires the actual supplied sales-call canvas, not an interchangeable report.
Acceptance impact: Exact template reuse and complete review navigation become observable checks.
four-landings: two added checks
Reason: Clarify brand/source adherence, audience coherence and real section QA.
Acceptance impact: A section/model count alone cannot pass.
Executor amendments
Append criterion ID, exact before/after text, rational reason, source/constraint provenance, alternative proof and acceptance impact before replacing a criterion. Preserve the original record. No executor amendment had been made at launch. Subsequent dated entries below retain each original and explain the applied change.
2026-10-02 · template-and-brand · meaningful family coverage
Exact original: All 28 labeled section layouts S1–S28 from new_template-3.html are meaningfully adapted in all four pages, with a coherent order and distinct jobs. Preserve layout structures, replace irrelevant template functions with truthful offer-related content, and avoid repeated filler. No placeholders, fake proof or unsupported guarantees remain.
Exact replacement: All 28 labeled section layouts S1–S28 from new_template-3.html are meaningfully adapted across the four-page family, with a documented source-to-page mapping and a distinct reader decision for each layout. Each of the four pages is complete, coherent and materially different from its matching A/B alternative. Preserve recognizable layout structures, replace irrelevant functions with truthful offer-related content, and avoid repeated filler. No placeholders, fake proof or unsupported guarantees remain.
Concrete reason: The actual supplied kit includes testimonial, guarantee, geography and certificate layouts. Repeating all 28 four times imposes 112 blocks and pushes the free-video entry into repeated or invented proof. The four real generated pages use all 28 distinct structures across 50 purposeful section uses, preserving offer-specific reasoning and readable mobile length.
User/source provenance: Matt's explicit permission in the authorized goal: a rational logged amendment may use complete meaningful coverage across the four-page family when strict repetition creates filler. Source evidence is the actual new_template-3.html, recorded in evidence/landing/template-sections.json. Worker recommendation was reviewed before applying.
Alternative proof: outputs/rita-journey-20261002/evidence/landing/layout-purpose-mapping.md and .json, actual data-template-layout section identities, complete copy/source/CTA checks, mandatory actual deployed mobile section screenshots and independent Luna content/UX review. These screenshot checks are still pending, not waived.
Impact: No change to four complete pages, 7 generated illustrations, 6 full main CTA alternatives, exact Gemini model, source wording, mobile-only QA or quantities. All 28 supplied layouts remain observable and mapped. The original criterion is retained here. No criterion was removed, the total remains 44.
Capture-brief alignment, 2026-10-02
The participant/expert screenshot briefs contained older 360×800 and 430×932 examples. Matt's current explicit mobile capture scope is 360/390/430 CSS pixels, height 844, DPR 1. The briefs are aligned to those actual dimensions. No acceptance criterion or required family/state coverage changes. The one substantive layout-family amendment remains separately recorded above.
Capture-basis clarification, 2026-10-02
The landing fix-proof brief added an actual-deployment-before requirement that is absent from both retained criteria landing-quality-evidence and independent-mobile-qa. Those criteria require actual mobile section QA, real independent review, Luna fixes and fresh postdeployment re-QA. The pre-correction captures were genuinely taken on the local frontend before its first publication. Retain their actual localhost URL, time, PNG hash and recorded source basis. Do not relabel them as deployed captures or reconstruct a fictional earlier publication. Compare them with fresh actual deployed after-correction captures and independent observations. Changes made after publication use the real deployed before revision. All significant defects, all four landing variants, all three mobile widths, fresh independent acceptance and the complete required family remain mandatory. No criterion or quantity changes. This aligns an untraceable parent-added capture restriction with Matt's explicit postdeployment requirement and keeps the stronger truthful provenance.