Participant, expert and consultation reasoning
The source six-module organization and daily proposal are separately labelled. The shared adult participant wants to know what to do now, whether a saved answer is really saved, whether a selected video has been sent, and how feedback changes tomorrow’s work. Rita wants the right person/day/source/video/reflection together, followed by a usable editor and an honest send receipt.
| Surface | Before and attention | Interpretation order and objection | Desired next thought | Applied improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Unsure what access opens | A daily practice loop, then a demo name, then all days | I can try this without a real account | Ordinary demo access, no fake login service or account creation |
| Overview | Knows the programme but not today’s step | Current useful day, clear six-source/14-proposal distinction, all day statuses | I can find my next task and my previous feedback | 14 distinct direct links, honest local states, early reservation with after-challenge timing |
| Day 1 | New participant, no previous feedback | First task, source-specific starting spontaneous clip, practice, reflection, daily clip | My starting video and my daily exercise have different jobs | Separate initial-video selection, local storage and receipt so it cannot be overwritten by the daily clip |
| Day 2 | Needs to reconnect to day1 | Yesterday’s video and specific feedback, seated breathing/month sequence | I know what to watch before practising | First scheduled rewatch checkpoint and matched prior-day ID |
| Day 3 | New articulation exercises could seem like a equipment checklist | Tools, original rationale, warm-up, precise tongue/lip tasks | I can start with the warm-up and work in order | Full numbered source instructions, unavailable source recordings labelled |
| Day 4 | Tempted to rush tongue-twisters | Vowel/jaw preparation before exact slow tongue-twister method | Accuracy comes before the speed attempt | Preserved complete examples, vowel-only stage and source repetition guidance |
| Day 5 | Recording a voice may feel unfamiliar | Day4 review, source explanation, M exercises, body contact and reflection | I know what to listen and feel for | Fictional sample feedback references the actual prior task, never the technical fixture |
| Day 6 | Multiple postures and target exercise may compete | Original sitting/standing progression, target, airflow sequence | I can follow the progression without a control wall | Source task numbering retained, video task exact M/V count context |
| Day 7 | TÁ/TI may be unfamiliar | Hand rhythm, word forms, then video | I can relate rhythm to a word | Complete word examples and exact ratios retained |
| Day 8 | Poem layout could be flattened into wrong reading order | Day7 review, columns, second poem row processing | I know how the poem should be read | Kínai templom is a four-column table with full seven rows, instructions retained, full source available |
| Day 9 | Long month sentences risk becoming a stamina challenge | Warm-up, original source, natural airflow pauses | I can notice my own limit | No invented duration target or score, exact source repetition guidance |
| Day 10 | Movement adds complexity | Standing progression, walking, swan table from memory | I understand the difference between tasks | Separate original sections and source’s seated/standing/walking repetition |
| Day 11 | Long M word list could overwhelm | Integration warm-up, exact word method, full list | I can use the five-word and ten-word groups | Word list is readable in two columns, full original remains downloadable |
| Day 12 | New phrase focus needs yesterday’s feedback | Day11 review, warm-up, target phrases | I can apply the observation to a specific next exercise | Explicit prior-day checkpoint and correct M phrase source |
| Day 13 | Wants an endpoint for breath counting | Source’s ease criterion rather than performance maximization | I can stop before pressing and record my observation | Honest unanswered scale and useful free text, no invented competition metric |
| Day 14 | May assume the programme finishes speech development | Final complete nonsense text, reflection, final video, consultation preparation | I can discuss what changed and what still needs work | Preserved complete final passage and source next-programme mention, no cure claim, direct consultation path |
| Rita day view | Needs relevant evidence before writing | Person/day/source/time/reflection/video, then feedback example/editor/preview/send | I can identify the recipient and next practice focus | Context switches as one keyed day, sample content labelled, empty send blocked |
| Consultation | Wants a real next step after practice | Preparation, sample availability, explicit confirmation, no real Meet link, change/cancel, next plan | I know when the call happens and what I would bring | Early reservation is clearly for after the challenge, all slots and postcall states stay simulated |
The hypothesis is that a visible first action, complete source exercises and an honest save/submit/feedback chain reduce uncertainty. This has not been tested with real participants. Generated alternatives and final deployed visual QA are parent-owned integration work.