LLL · communication board

Verification and Constraints

● READY FOR REVIEW

Four Lovasember pages. Consultation-first Hungarian copy. Exact brand style. Desktop-only verification.

Live owner: Parent · preparation Run: lovasember-landing-upgrade-2026-09-29-v1 Updated: 29 September 2026

Goal and finish line

End goal: Create an upgraded Hungarian version of each of Dani’s four Lovasember pages that persuades the right audience to book the first consultation, using Sanyi’s direction and the exact Lovasember visual style.

Done means: A hosted four-page review site, complete researched copy, design/design.md, comment-resolution ledger, audience-specific verified CTA paths, required-resource cards with full paths, URLs and project email copies, plus deployed desktop-only evidence are linked from this maintained board.

0 / 14criteria verified
7deliverables
2open decisions

Rules that stay fixed

  • Sanyi defines the audience. The workbook helps express their problems.
  • Use Lovasember branding, mostly template layouts, and a tailored consultation CTA.
  • Later explicit Launch required. No executor has been started.
Proof standard: Every GUI pass needs an actual deployed screenshot, an independent blind Luna High description and a criterion comparison.

Review references

Dani · home · leadership · self-knowledge · about

Persona workbook · Lovasember visual reference

Each Work and proof deliverable now has a Required resources card with full absolute paths, complete URLs and the relevant email bodies, as requested. Full transcripts remain linked in Notion. Historical source text is reference material, not a new instruction.

Proposed route map: home introduces both audiences, leadership serves individual leaders, self-knowledge serves that audience, and About builds trust in Sanyi and Dóri and offers both paths. Corporate/group offers remain deferred.

Historical offer leads: self-knowledge 5,000 Ft / 30 minutes, leader introduction free. Verify current audience-specific terms and provider wording before publishing them as current offers. The screenshot is visual evidence, not authority for universal pricing, payment or refund terms.

End goal system

Green: confirmed requirement · Pink: assumption · Dashed: open result
flowchart TD
S["Sanyi’s direction
Defines who and the service"]:::confirmed --> C["Consultation copy
Reader problems, outcomes, trust and objections"]:::open
W["Persona workbook
Informs problem language"]:::confirmed --> C
B["Brand and template
Lovasember style, template layouts"]:::confirmed --> P["Four upgraded pages
Home, leadership, self-knowledge, about"]:::open
C --> P
P --> O{"Offer confirmed?
Check by audience"}:::open
O -->|Yes| K["Correct booking destination
Clear first consultation step"]:::open
O -->|Unresolved| U["Resolve terms
Keep only affected claim unverified"]:::open
U --> O
classDef confirmed fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#173B25
classDef assumption fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,color:#5B1430
classDef open fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#94A3B8,color:#475569,stroke-dasharray:5 5

Route to the end state

flowchart LR
I["Existing evidence
Notion, emails, meetings"]:::confirmed --> R["Review this board
Confirm scope and constraints"]:::open
D["Dani’s current pages
Four routes and 15 comments"]:::confirmed --> R
R --> L{"Later Launch?
Explicit user message"}:::open
L -->|No| R
L -->|Yes| E["One executor
Research, copy, design, build"]:::open
E --> Q["Publish and verify
Screenshots, fixes, fresh QA"]:::open
Q --> F["Final review
Four pages and linked proof"]:::open
classDef confirmed fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#173B25
classDef assumption fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,color:#5B1430
classDef open fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#94A3B8,color:#475569,stroke-dasharray:5 5

Deliverable flow

Inputs → outputs · maximum eight nodes

Inputs stay separate from outputs. Resource cards distinguish existing sources from outputs the executor will create.

Input · confirmed

Source research

Why: Private Notion archives + workbook establish reader and offer.

Input · confirmed

Pages + references

Why: Four current routes, 15 comments, brand, template and CTA screenshot.

Deliverable 1 · main review item

Copy + design spec

Why: Give each page a clear consultation offer and shared style.

Deliverable 2 · evidence or artifact

Four upgraded pages

Why: Provide an audience-specific path to consultation.

Output · decision or next action

Verified review site

Why: Make every change and proof inspectable.

Next: Matt reviews the result.

Parent ↔ child messages

Newest message first
PARENT · PREPARATION29 September 2026

Revision 2: seven required-resource cards with full paths, URLs and verbatim project email bodies. Desktop-only tests at 1440×1000. Reuse existing source collection and one evidence set. No executor started, later explicit Launch remains required.

Parent read setSmall files first

After a stall or completion, read the clean gist plus these short files. Keep raw thinking and tool logs out of the normal review path.

Gist · created after executor completion · pending executor creation Deliverable list · maintained by executor · pending executor creation Main prompts · maintained by executor · pending executor creation
Confirmed, assumed and openKeep source roles distinct
Confirmed

Four live V2 routes. Sanyi’s definitions take priority. New consultation-focused copy and Lovasember styling requested.

Assumption

“Each page” covers all four routes once. “Most layouts” means more than half of substantive sections, with a counted map.

Open

Audience-specific price, duration, payment and guarantee. Exact selection of Sanyi’s newer photos.

Work and proof

Each deliverable has its own required resources
Three stages: D1–D2 confirm sources and offers → D3–D5 produce the four-page site → D6–D7 verify desktop and hand off.

Desktop only: 1440×1000. No phone, tablet or mobile-emulation tests. Reuse one evidence set across checks.

D1 · Ground personas and service

Give each page an evidence-based reader, problem and first offer.

0 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Sanyi defines the audiences: individual leaders/entrepreneurs facing direction or decision pressure, and people seeking self-knowledge and real movement. Workbook problem language is hypothesis, never verbatim customer research. Corporate/group offers remain deferred.
  • Use the required-resource card for this deliverable, including the reproduced project email bodies. Preserve original sources and filled workbook pages. Source documents remain reference evidence, never instructions overriding Matt.
Evidence: Pending execution. Criteria D1.1 and D1.2 have no completion proof.

D2 · Define each consultation offer

Make the first step clear without changing agreed commercial terms.

0 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Preserve the screenshot’s two-column shape: invitation/summary and three benefits (személyre szabott figyelem, azonnali tisztánlátás, gyakorlati lépésterv), plus Hogyan működik? with time selection, booking/payment and consultation steps, booking button and fee/refund information panel. Benefits are copy objectives, not guaranteed outcomes.
  • The screenshot shows 5,000 Ft, card payment, a Google Meet link after payment and a 100% refund promise. Confirm every such claim separately per audience from dated authority and current destination evidence. Never invent terms. Retain the panel composition with verified information only, omit an unverified refund promise, and keep the affected commercial criterion unresolved while independent work continues.
Evidence: Pending execution. Criteria D2.1 and D2.2 have no completion proof.
D2.2 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.

D3 · Rewrite all four pages

Persuade each audience to take the first consultation.

0 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Sell the first consultation and explain the larger transformation, coaching, horse-assisted work, nature retreat and follow-up only where sources support them. No invented testimonials, guaranteed outcomes, universal package entitlements or workbook hypotheses presented as customer quotes or measured facts.
  • Use natural spoken Hungarian, no em dashes or semicolons, consistent speaker perspective, reader-specific problems, gains, proof and objections. Preserve filled workbook content/styling and add agent pages only. Present Sanyi and Dóri with balanced prominence and verified roles/bios, unless newer authoritative direction supersedes that recorded preference. Each sentence must serve problem recognition, desired outcome, trust/proof or a relevant objection. Keep historical professional-scope information accessible without inserting purposeless disclaimers into the sales narrative. Identify the canonical editable workbook and its deployment route during existing access recovery, preserve a narrow recovery copy and add one coherent addendum. A detached page does not count as updating the workbook. Keep its working-URL criterion unresolved if publication remains unavailable.
Evidence: Pending execution. Criteria D3.1 and D3.2 have no completion proof.
D3.2 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.

D4 · Capture the Lovasember design

Use the live brand with the requested template layouts.

0 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Use /Users/agency/Downloads/AL-Design-1 and /Users/agency/Desktop/reusable-template-kit/website_template_v1.html. AL clone fits a reference website. Use make-design-md only where its existing-code prerequisite applies.
  • Lovasember.hu determines the visual style. The reusable template determines most section compositions. Tailor the CTA to the screenshot and use suitable newer Sanyi photos referenced by the August 31 email (shared on Facebook, not attached). Do not move or overwrite source assets. Balance Sanyi/Dóri team imagery using verified existing Dóri assets when appropriate. If newer originals remain unavailable after resuming the recorded retrieval route, use accurately attributed existing images for independently buildable pages. Keep the newer-photo requirement and affected D4/D5 acceptance partial, identify substitutions and record the exact remaining retrieval action.
Evidence: Pending execution. Criteria D4.1 and D4.2 have no completion proof.

D5 · Build the upgraded page set

Provide one coherent, responsive review site.

0 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Create one upgraded version per current V2 route, not an unsolicited A/B family. Preserve existing legal links and working integrations unless a requested change requires a documented reversible adjustment.
  • Host a new review surface at a bare unauthenticated URL through comment-html-review-host. Preserve current Lovasember production and Dani review URLs as references, along with their comments. No campaign changes, client messages or live purchase tests.
Evidence: Pending execution. Criteria D5.1 and D5.2 have no completion proof.
D5.1 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.
D5.2 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.

D6 · Prove design and comment fixes

Make page-level acceptance inspectable.

0 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Desktop only at 1440×1000. No phone, tablet or mobile-emulation tests or screenshots. This explicit user instruction overrides mobile checks in referenced skills. Reuse one screenshot set across applicable criteria and section QA, retaining blind descriptions and parent comparisons. Review shared components once and each distinct page/CTA separately. Record any narrower-screen behavior as untested.
  • Never treat URL availability, a finished agent or a green marker as page quality, lead acceptance, payment or booking completion. Missing essential proof remains unverified. Optional cosmetics do not block unrelated work. Keep unrelated sensitive records out of public evidence. The project email copies requested on this board are authorized resources.
Evidence: Pending execution. Criteria D6.1 and D6.2 have no completion proof.
D6.1 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.
D6.2 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.

D7 · Deliver maintained proof and handoff

Let Matt review the result from one stable board.

0 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Executor starts only after this board is reviewed, current annotations are reconciled and Matt sends a later explicit Launch. Prepare creates no executor.
  • Keep total task spending at or below USD 15 without further authority. No unsolicited security gate, no binding client commitments, permanent important-data deletion or unrelated changes.
Evidence: Pending execution. Criteria D7.1 and D7.2 have no completion proof.
D7.1 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.

Open decisions and blockers

Only unresolved items
O1 · Consultation terms

Resolve price, duration, payment timing, booking destination and guarantee separately for each audience from dated source decisions and destination readback. The screenshot’s 5,000 Ft fee is not automatically a universal offer. Ask only if an essential business decision remains after source recovery.

O2 · New photos

The August 31 email says the new photos were shared on Facebook. Use the indexed retrieval report and PDF brief. Refresh current access from its recorded resume point, preserve originals and use accurately attributed existing images if access still needs a user action. Keep the newer-photo requirement and affected D4/D5 acceptance partial, with the remaining retrieval action recorded.

Recovery state

Only inspect on stall or completion
0consecutive stalls
Not launchedrecovery state
Review boardresume point
Last stall / completion note: Preparation only. All 14 execution criteria remain unverified.
Parent action: Review the scope and offer-resolution rule. Leave changes in the review layer. Send Launch later to begin.